New Page 2

 

Welcome to SDR!

  • Amused
  • Angry
  • Annoyed
  • Awesome
  • Bemused
  • Cocky
  • Cool
  • Crazy
  • Crying
  • Down
  • Drunk
  • Embarraded
  • Enraged
  • Friendly
  • Geeky
  • Grumpy
  • Happy
  • Hungry
  • Piratey
  • Poorly
  • Sad
  • Shy
  • Sneaky
  • Tired
  • + Reply to Thread
    Results 1 to 7 of 7

    Thread: Fluidized Filter

    1. #1
      ilikualot's Avatar
      ilikualot is offline Registered User
      Enter Status Here..
       
      I am:
      Set you mood here...
       
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Kensington
      Posts
      795

      Fluidized Filter

      Does ne1 know if these are good? I am buying a tank with one and I have no idea what they are for. Do they replace the skimmer or are they in addition to the skimmer? anyone with experience let me know.

      Jarod

    2. #2
      wsonner's Avatar
      wsonner is offline Registered User
      Enter Status Here..
       
      I am:
      Set you mood here...
       
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      El Cajon, CA
      Posts
      552
      I think the general consensus is that they are TOO good. That is, they are so efficient at converting ammonia that they become a nitrate producer. I think they are COOL but I haven't heard of a lot of people using them with great enthusiasm. I tried one for a while and it was tough to get adjusted but I might have had a cruddy model. Anyway, you would still want to have a good skimmer.

    3. #3
      dbrooks is offline Registered User
      Enter Status Here..
       
      I am:
      Set you mood here...
       
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      Scripps Ranch
      Posts
      950
      Are you talking about a fluidized bed? I used one until my live rock matured. It now sits full of water - but cut-off from circulation. I just had a look at it...it's got a bunch of black crap growing in it...perhaps it's anoxic?

      If you are going to have a tank with a fair amount of live rock, I wouldn't bother.

    4. #4
      ilikualot's Avatar
      ilikualot is offline Registered User
      Enter Status Here..
       
      I am:
      Set you mood here...
       
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Kensington
      Posts
      795
      So would it be best for a Fish only setup?

    5. #5
      wsonner's Avatar
      wsonner is offline Registered User
      Enter Status Here..
       
      I am:
      Set you mood here...
       
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      El Cajon, CA
      Posts
      552
      Quote Originally Posted by ilikualot
      So would it be best for a Fish only setup?
      You'll likely find that it isn't recommended by too many people. Anyone??

    6. #6
      Doorag is offline Registered User
      Enter Status Here..
       
      I am:
      Set you mood here...
       
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      UTC
      Posts
      241
      If you pull the plug on the lifegard fluidized bed filters, the sand goes up the intake tube. It doesn't restart when you plug it back in.

    7. #7
      Dakota is offline Registered User
      Enter Status Here..
       
      I am:
      Set you mood here...
       
      Join Date
      Apr 2004
      Location
      Ventura, CA
      Posts
      2,642
      IMO, only good for fish only setups. Too many nitrates for reefs, plus the live rock will do ALL the biological filtration you need. So for a reef, NO, for fish only, YES.

    + Reply to Thread

    Thread Information

    Users Browsing this Thread

    There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

       

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts